La Granja VIP: Lozada questions Camejo's self-nomination strategy
A contestant alleges his partner sought nomination to eliminate a teammate rather than protect the alliance.
By Enzo Conti ·

Fernando Lozada challenged the recent game moves of Julio Camejo during a private conversation inside La Granja VIP. The exchange centered on whether Camejo’s push for nomination was an act of team loyalty or a calculated risk to reshape his group's composition. Lozada argued that the timing and intent of the maneuver suggested a personal agenda rather than a collective one.
Lozada told his partner, "Es más estrategia tuya," suggesting the decision prioritized Camejo's individual safety over the stability of their alliance. The statement implies that Camejo viewed the nomination process as a tool to secure his own position while simultaneously creating an opportunity to remove a specific member from his team.
The discussion specifically addressed the status of Kevyn Contreras, known by his nickname "Bicolor." Lozada indicated that protecting Contreras was not Camejo's primary objective. Instead, the alleged strategy involved using the nomination and salvation dynamics to alter the current balance of power within their camp. This approach contrasts with the typical expectation that partners defend their allies to maintain group strength.
The reality show relies heavily on shifting alliances and verbal agreements between contestants. When individual interests override group loyalty, the stability of these partnerships is tested. Lozada's comments expose a disconnect in how the two men view their roles within the competition. By questioning the motives behind the move, Lozada placed doubt on the level of commitment Camejo feels toward his teammates.
Other participants are now watching these interactions closely. If other housemates interpret Camejo's actions in the same way Lozada does, the trust within the alliance may erode. Each move in the competition can alter the trajectory of the game, and this specific incident has already sparked debate among the residents. The focus has shifted from who is next to be nominated to why the nomination was sought in the first place.
The incident highlights the tension between strategic self-preservation and alliance maintenance. While no formal vote has been taken on the matter yet, the dialogue has set the stage for potential conflict. The housemates must now decide whether to trust Camejo's stated reasons or align with Lozada's interpretation of the events. The outcome of these negotiations could determine the next major eviction.
Source: XHJK-TDT





