AdvertiseDonate
LatestTwo Spangle deputies struck in shootout; one dies, one on life support
☰ SectionsReporting on the stories people talk about.
Verified Newz · 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604

Latest stories

  1. Two Spangle deputies struck in shootout; one dies, one on life support
  2. Braveboy wins full term as Prince George's County drops at-large council seats
  3. Trump's $5,000 Dividend Promise Collides With Democratic Sweep of Congress
  4. Democrats Sweep Congress and Statehouses in Historic 2026 Midterm Victory
  5. Trump's $5,000 Dividend: A Vote-Buying Gamble That Democrats Now Control
Politics · Southern California

DOJ Moves to Charge James Comey: Statute of Limitations Dispute

The Justice Department filed a criminal information to extend the 10-year window for a 2016 leak case, a move Comey's legal team calls invalid.

By Enzo Conti ·

Illustration for: DOJ Moves to Charge James Comey: Statute of Limitations Dispute
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The Justice Department has filed a criminal information against former FBI Director James Comey to extend the statute of limitations for a decade-old case involving a classified information leak. The move, revealed Monday in newly unsealed court documents, allows the department to bring charges within the standard 10-year federal limit. Comey’s legal team immediately rejected the filing, arguing it is procedurally invalid and outside the allowable timeframe for indictment.

The underlying allegations concern an October 2016 New York Times article that disclosed a secret court order. The order required Yahoo to scan emails for messages linked to a foreign terrorist organization. The story cited two anonymous government officials regarding a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order that barred public disclosure. Federal authorities began investigating the FBI's disclosure to the newspaper in early 2017.

Prior inquiries into the same matter did not result in charges. Then-Special Counsel John Durham recommended against criminal charges in a classified memo in December 2018. A second investigation, opened by the U.S. Attorney's office for the District of Columbia in January 2019 under the code name Tropical Vortex, closed without charges in February 2020. Comey’s attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, noted that both previous government reviews concluded no one should be charged.

Fitzgerald stated that the new filing was not approved by a judge or issued by a grand jury. He described the current action as the third attempt by the Department of Justice to charge Comey with a federal crime in just over one year. The defense maintains that Comey is innocent and that the current charges are barred by the statute of limitations. A Justice Department spokesperson called the practice of filing a criminal information to toll the statute of limitations a widely recognized procedure in federal courts.

Comey responded to the news in a video statement released after the documents were unsealed. He said, "Well, they're back, again," adding that the situation would be funny if it were not an appalling abuse of the department. He emphasized that he remains innocent and not afraid, expressing continued belief in an independent federal judiciary. The filing represents a clear escalation in the administration's legal actions against Comey, who has faced two other criminal cases since President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year.

The department did not comment further on the investigation, citing its ongoing nature. This legal maneuvering occurs in the run-up to next week's midterm elections. Comey, who served as FBI director when Trump took office in 2017, has been a vocal critic of the president since being fired in May 2017 amid the Russia investigation. His first case against him was dismissed after a judge found the prosecuting attorney was illegally appointed. A separate case from April involved a social media post that officials deemed a threat to the president.

The case highlights the continuing tension between the executive branch and the former FBI director. The government argues it is following standard legal practices to preserve its ability to prosecute. The defense argues the government is reviving a case that was twice declined for prosecution. The next steps in the legal battle will depend on how the court rules on the validity of the criminal information and the statute of limitations defense.

Source: ABC7 Los Angeles

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Verified Newz in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Verified Newz in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.